What Do You Think? Lessons in True Creative Collaboration

What Do You Think? Lessons in True Creative Collaboration

There is nothing like being out of your element to realize just how insulated your element is. In this case, I have been working on a documentary film, doing the original music as well as loaning snippets of earlier works of mine to the project. Last weekend we had a session in which the director, editor, and I got together for me to play for them the music I had composed so far to get their feedback regarding mood, timings, and the like.

Even though I pride myself on how much I try to stress collaboration between performers and composers, I was still taken aback with the ease and forthrightness both of these individuals had when talking about the music. “This works great here.” “This part totally does not fit.” “We need a stronger entry”. “That totally captures the energy.” “Can we score this differently?” I had never been in such a workshop setting where everyone felt free to speak so freely about the composition as it was still in its nebulous form.

It was not a one-way street, either. Ironically, I first felt shy about speaking up, as I am new to the film world. I did not know what my place was in the process. However, I soon got into the rhythm and felt free to offer my opinion about music cues, as well as other dramatic aspects of the film. It ended up being one of the most fruitful collaborative session I have been in, with everyone feeling like each of us “got it” when discussing our ideas.

Later in the week, I commented to the editor about the experience and how I was pleasantly surprised at the comfort and freedom both he and the producer/director felt in sharing their thoughts about how to develop the music. I mused about how in the classical music world it is still a challenge to get performers and composers to open up to one another during the creation or rehearsal of a piece. There is still some stigma or assumption associated with the compositional process that inhibits some from feeling that they can speak freely and be a welcomed contributor. To these remarks, the editor said something illuminating, to the effect of, “Well, in film we all look at one another as peers, on an equal footing.”

He is right. We are peers. Equals. The composer is on the same spectrum as the player. While we each have our special training and experience in our respective field, (composing, directing, conducting, playing), in the end, if we are all working on the same composition, ideally there should be a give and take in terms of being able to express one’s idea and be taken seriously. This does not mean that the owner of the work in question is a slave to the other’s suggestions. Ultimately, final creative and pragmatic decisions must lay on his or her shoulders. However I do feel that if such input does takes place, the resulting work will be better for it, as it makes the composer/producer/choregrapher really think and consider aspects of the project in ways perhaps not previously considered.

Another thing to consider is that, while the “peer factor” is a real issue in the new music world, there are other factors at work that I feel the film world does not have. In our history, most of the music performers play is already composed and “completed.” The composer is not present or is even dead. Thus, performance decisions fall fully on the performers. In this environment, a sense of almost romantic deference for the composer has often been applied, sometimes to the point of freezing the performer’s ability to make original performance practice decisions. Because of this, most players naturally do not know how to deal when the composer is there—why or what should they contribute? In the film world, such precedence is not there. In fact, film started its art without the presence of permenant music in the work. If there was music, it accompanied a film live and was often improvised by a living performer. Thus from the onset a composer was either involved after the film had been started or music was added well after the film was completed. If anything, a tendency began in which the composer in a film became like a performer in concert music—we are the last to be brought into the creative process, and thus do not know sometimes quite what to do.

I admit, I got lucky working with the people I am on this documentary. I know there are horror stories of composers being treated like automatons on media projects, just as there are horror stories of composers treating players as automatons on music projects. However, I still think that overall we can learn a lot from film about how to incorporate everyone involved in a project on a more inclusive creative footing and thus make a much higher quality piece of art than otherwise would have been created.

Sign up for our monthly NewMusicBox newsletter

NewMusicBox provides a space for those engaged with new music to communicate their experiences and ideas in their own words. Articles and commentary posted here reflect the viewpoints of their individual authors; their appearance on NewMusicBox does not imply endorsement by New Music USA.

5 thoughts on “What Do You Think? Lessons in True Creative Collaboration

  1. rtanaka

    I agree! I wish there would be more collaboration opportunities offered at schooling systems in general. Film-makers always need music, so why not put students together to work on some projects? It can sometimes be a pain if the artists don’t see things eye to eye, but the process itself I think is very important.

    Besides, I think most of the jobs available right now involve some sort of collaboration with other artists…film, video games, dance…I actually just recently finished a gig for a theater company where I did live accompaniment to the actors on stage. It was fun and I learned a lot about myself in the process.

  2. Aeterna

    I’m an undergrad composition major, and I’ve had the wonderful opportunity to score two short student films in the time I’ve been studying, and in both cases, it’s been a wonderful and enlightening experience. In both cases, I worked with directors who had little experience with music, but who were still quite willing to tell me “this works” and “this doesn’t work” while ultimately giving me the freedom to write what I thought would fit. It was actually really great to get the opinion of a non-musician, because they tend to see what you’ve written as a whole rather than focusing on the details, and that’s a great perspective to have on my music.

  3. pgblu

    I reject the idea that performers and composers are equals. I do believe that there should be mutual respect and a willingness to learn from one another, but at the end of the day the composer is the one to put their name on the work, and bears the ultimate responsibility for the finished product. Even if this top-down philosophy is not adhered to in all cases, I think the word equality is definitely a little too strong.

    The composer has intentions, and the performers do their best to meet them. That’s the point of departure for me. Perhaps the performers can persuade the composer that her intentions are best pursued another way, but I would hazard that the intentions of the performers, where these deviate from those of the composer, should definitely take a back seat. (ducks behind sofa)

  4. rperey

    I think it would be great if composers and media artists could learn together. I’m a musician, but I’m also a broadcast major. As a media editor/producer, I always need music for my productions. It would be great if there were programs where composition students and media students could learn and practice working together. Composing and Producing is actually not too different. We just have our own terminology. For example “Beats” are actually different in production than in music. There’s the “editing beat” which is the way the picture is edited and there’s the music kind of beat.

    Actually I thought about this idea at one point while I was working on a show for KCSM. We needed music performers for our student produced show about music in the Bay Area. We needed to find musicians that would let us record them without us having to pay them for a performance. Since it was a student production, all we had to give in return was the final edit of the music production – a dvd and cd of the recording.

    I then thought it would be a great idea to give this recording opportunity to music students. I remember trying to create music samples for my college applications into music schools. At that time, I hardly knew anyone who would record me. I didn’t know that Media students are always looking for opportunities to record musicians.

    So, wouldn’t it be great if a music school and a media school collaborated together so that all the music students could have music portfolios created by the media students who need to practice creating productions? It’s a win-win situation. Music students can have their portfolios recorded for free and then Media students would actually have good material to record.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Conversation and respectful debate is vital to the NewMusicBox community. However, please remember to keep comments constructive and on-topic. Avoid personal attacks and defamatory language. We reserve the right to remove any comment that the community reports as abusive or that the staff determines is inappropriate.