White Wine and Post-Modernism

White Wine and Post-Modernism

A week ago my friend, Brendan, (the same friend who introduced me to Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin) invited me to see a production of Gertrude Stein’s short play, White Wines, produced by Drew Pisarra at UNDER St. Mark’s. They performed this short, 10-15 minute nonsensical play five times, serving a glass of white wine to match each performance, and by the end of show I felt like—possibly—there was a chance I might’ve actually understood what was going on. But this was tentative. To give you an example of just how difficult Gertrude Stein’s writing is to decipher, here’s the first few lines of the play:

Cunning very cunning and cheap, at that rate a sale is a place to use type writing. Shall we go home.

Cunning, cunning, quite cunning, a block a strange block is filled with choking.

Not too cunning, not cunning enough for wit and a stroke and careless laughter, not cunning enough.

After the play, Brendan pointed out to me how incredible it is that the post-modern world makes such a performance possible. That we could sit for an hour, be presented with a Gertrude Stein play that defies all Victorian convention, and have it be considered a perfectly normal experience, exploring a canonical writer. He sent me an excerpt from the first chapter of Frederic Jameson’s Postmodernism: The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism, explaining how modern art that was once considered “variously ugly, dissonant, obscure, scandalous, immoral, subversive, and generally ‘antisocial'” has now been institutionalized and accepted into Western society:

Consider, for example, the powerful alternative position that postmodernism is itself little more than one more stage of modernism proper (if not, indeed, of the even older romanticism); it may indeed be conceded that all the features of postmodernism I am about to enumerate can be detected, full-blown, in this or that preceding modernism (including such astonishing genealogical precursors as Gertrude Stein, Raymond Roussel, or Marcel Duchamp, who may be considered outright postmodernists, avant la lettre). What has not been taken into account by this view, however, is the social position of the older modernism, or better still, its passionate repudiation by an older Victorian and post-Victorian bourgeoisie for whom its forms and ethos are received as being variously ugly, dissonant, obscure, scandalous, immoral, subversive, and generally “antisocial.” It will be argued here, however, that a mutation in the sphere of culture has rendered such attitudes archaic. Not only are Picasso and Joyce no longer ugly, they now strike us, on the whole, as rather “realistic,” and this is the result of a canonisation and academic institutionalisation of the modern movement generally that can be to the late 1950s. This is surely one of the most plausible explanations for the emergence of postmodernism itself, since the younger generation of the 1960s will now confront the formerly oppositional modern movement as a set of dead classics, which “weigh like a nightmare on the brains of the living,” as Marx once said in a different context…. As for the postmodern revolt against all that, however, it must equally be stressed that its own offensive features—from obscurity and sexually explicit material to psychological squalor and overt expressions of social and political defiance, which transcend anything that might have been imagined at the most extreme moments of high modernism—no longer scandalise anyone and are not only received with the greatest complacency but have themselves become institutionalised and are at one with the official or public culture of Western society.

There’s an awesome story about John Cage and Gertrude Stein in Cage’s forward to Silence. When assigned to write an essay about the Lake poets at Pomona College, John Cage wrote in the manner of Gertrude Stein, “irrelevantly and repetitiously,” and got an A. The second time he did it he was failed. I guess the same could be said for John Cage. Because we live in a post-modern world where modernism has become canonized and revered, it is possible to see a performance of 4’33 and have it be a socially acceptable event.

But, as Jameson goes on to say, when the modern becomes canonized, and revolutionary art becomes acceptable, does our new lack of a dominant cultural logic means that “genuine difference [cannot] be measured or assessed?” I’m unsure how this line of theory, which is mostly literary, translates into music, but I’d love to hear your thoughts.

NewMusicBox provides a space for those engaged with new music to communicate their experiences and ideas in their own words. Articles and commentary posted here reflect the viewpoints of their individual authors; their appearance on NewMusicBox does not imply endorsement by New Music USA.

5 thoughts on “White Wine and Post-Modernism

  1. philmusic


    In my day, it seems so long ago, theoretical editorial was used to explain art. Now it seems that art merely exists as editorial to explain theory.

    Oddly folks are much more accepting of experimental writing than of music. Many folks who shun atonal music love Joyce and Stein (who notable never spoke to each other).

    Phil “Methuselah” Fried
    Phil’s very old page

  2. colin holter

    But, as Jameson goes on to say, when the modern becomes canonized, and revolutionary art becomes acceptable, does our new lack of a dominant cultural logic means that “genuine difference [cannot] be measured or assessed?”

    My two cents: I think it means that the process of assessing the difference between art with revolutionary potential and art without is no longer productive. In fact, it may be that socially disruptive (“revolutionary”) art was a Romantic conceit all along, clung to throughout modernity as well. Now that everyone knows riots don’t break out in concert halls anymore, we’re abandoning that pretense and formulating new models to relate our work to society. Thought-provoking post, JZ – kudos for bringing in Jameson, one of my faves.

    By the way, if pgblu is around, maybe he could relate this to Robin Hoffmann’s piece/concept Finte.

  3. Lisa X

    Mcluhan would argue that the content of the play is not the important feature of your evening. Rather, sitting with people facing a stage/screen/field, drinking, and taking in entertainment are the essential activities. To spend and evening this way is not only perfectly normal but absolutely ordinary. The primary role of content is to shape the demographics of the crowd.

  4. philmusic

    “..does our new lack of a dominant cultural logic means that “genuine difference [cannot] be measured or assessed?”

    It seems that with the above statement one must suppose that art stops today at 4:30.

    Since that does not or will ever happen one might conclude that the world of art is not standing still and is constantly being created and recreated. Cannon notwithstanding.

    So, for each generation, (not to mention each scene) the logic of measurement and assessment changes.

    Phil Fried

    Phil’s on topic page


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Conversation and respectful debate is vital to the NewMusicBox community. However, please remember to keep comments constructive and on-topic. Avoid personal attacks and defamatory language. We reserve the right to remove any comment that the community reports as abusive or that the staff determines is inappropriate.